According to The
Ethnologue, the world's largest catalogue of languages and dialects,
the Nahuatl language of Tabasco is extinct - it no longer has any
living speakers. [UPDATE: As of today 2/22/2015, two days after I posted this blog, Ethnologue has updated their listing of Tabasco Nahuatl, no longer categorizing it as extinct, and noting a population of 30.]
Fermín Cruz Álvarez
and some 30-40 of his neighbors and family members in his community
in the municipality of Comalcalco, Tabasco, since this is the
language they grew up speaking. It is also the language that Fermín
has spent his free time trying to promote the past 7 years. He has
been teaching the language to youths and adults, and with the help of
several linguists he wrote and published a small dictionary through
CDI (Comisión del Desarrollo de los
Pueblos Indígenas).
So the Tabasco Nahuatl
language is not extinct. It does have native speakers, although there
are very few of them, and the language is in imminent risk of
disappearing unless someone assists Fermín and the community. His
efforts to revive his language are hampered by the fact that he has
to work, cultivating cacao, black pepper and fish to sustain his
family, and that he receives little or no remuneration for his work.
I visited Fermin in the summer of 2014, and the rest of this blog post
is dedicated to giving a brief sketch of Tabasco Nawat, and to argue
that this is an imminently interesting and important variety of Nawat
that really deserves support and recognition. And if you read all the way to the end, you will get a chance to listen to what the language sounds like and read a small sample text of Fermin telling about how to make cacao.
Some Background:
Nahua people have a long
history in the south-east of Mexico. It probably arrived in Tabasco
sometime before 800 AD, as Nahua speakers migrated south from Central
Mexico along the gulf coast, through Chiapas, and Guatemala and into
Central America. At the time of the Spanish invasion, Nahuan
languages were spoken all along the gulf coast of Veracruz and into
Tabasco, where the language coexisted with Mixe-Zoquean and Mayan
languages. The municipality of Comalcalco, Tabasco is the location
of an important classical period Mayan archaeological site, also
named Comalcalco, which was probably built by the Chontal maya people
who still inhabit the area. The Ayapa Zoque language, which has
become famous because of a media hyped story about two of its last
fluent speakers, is spoken less than fifteen
minutes from Fermín's house by car. Tabasco has
always been an important area in Mesoamerica – it was here that the
Olmec culture flourished in the pre-classic period, and in the
classic and post-classic periods it was an important site of trade,
because of the abundance of Cacao and other tropical luxury goods.
Comalcalco is itself a Nahuatl name, meaning “In the house of
comales”, the comal
being the round ceramic griddle used by many Mesoamericans for baking
tortillas on.
Tabasco Nawat:
The
small family of Nahuan languages has two main branches: The Western
branch includes most of the dialects spoken in the Center of Mexico
and on the Pacfific coast in Michoacan and in Durango, and
historically in Jalisco, Zacatecas and Colima. The Eastern branch
includes the Huastecan dialects spoken in north-eastern Mexico, and
the dialects of central Puebla, and Southern Veracruz, as well as the
Pipil Nawat language spoken in El Salvador – and many varieties
that are no longer spoken such as those of Chiapas and Guatemala. The
Tabasco variety belongs to the Eastern branch. Some of the
characteristics of the Eastern branch is that they use the pronouns
neha/naha ”I”, teha/taha “you” and yeha/yaha “he/she”.
They also do not use the word “ahmo” as the only negation word,
and most Eastern varieties do not use ahmo at all (Pharao Hansen
2014). And they are also characterized by having the vowel /i/ in a
number of words where Western Nahuan has /e/ (Canger & Dakin
1985), and by only using the plural morpheme -meh
or -met
and not the of the morpheme -tin
which is used in most Western varieties. Tabasco Nawat, along with
the Nahuan languages of Central Puebla, Southern Veracruz, and the
Pipil Nawat language of El Salvador also do not use the tl-sound
which is such a famous characteristic of the so-called Classical
Nahuatl language and most of the Nahuan languages spoken in the
Center of Mexico, but instead have changed all their previous tl's to
t. That is why I write Tabasco Nawat
and not Tabasco Nawatl.
This is not a feature shared by all the Eastern varieties, as for
example Huastecan Nahuatl still has the /tl/ sound.
In
terms of phonology, apart from the lack of /tl/ another interesting
feature is that Tabasco Nawat has five vowel qualities /i, e, a, o,
u/. Most other Nahuan languages have only four vowel qualities, as
they do not have the vowel /u/ or if they have /u/ then they don't
have o. But Tabasco Nawat has both. This is because it has not
changed all its o's to /u/, but only some of them following a rule
that I have not yet been able to fully work out. It seems that
particularly long /o:/'s have become /u/. The language has not
changed its final stop consonants /t/ and /k/ to glottal stops as has
happened in the nearby Nahuan languages of southern Veracruz, and it
has /h/ where “Classical Nahuatl” has the saltillo. It also
voices the velar stop /k/ to /g/ both between vowels and even
frequently at the beginning of words. Tabasco Nawat also has the
sound /f/ corresponding to the consonant cluster /hw/ in other
dialects. For example the word “feather” which in some other
dialects is /ihwitl/
in Tabasco Nawat is /ifit/
(this is not uncommon in other varieties either, and is found both in
Morelos and Zongolica).
Interestingly
Tabasco Nawat also has a morphophonological process that turns /w/
into /n/ whenever it appears at the end of a word. For example the
past tense of the verb /chowa/
“to do” is [ogichin]
“he did it” (also note that the vowel varies, the /w/ having
colored the /i/ to [o], but since the n does not color the preceding
vowel the past form retains the vowel /i/. This strongly suggests
that the rule turning /w#/ to /n#/ is old, or at least older than the
change of /i/ to /o/). And when nouns take the possessive suffix that
is /w/ in most other dialects here it is /-n/, for example “my
wife” is /no-soa-n/,
and “my name” is /no-tu:ga-n/.
This morpho-phonological rule is shared with the dialects of Morelos
and (some of) the dialects of the Zongolica region in Veracruz. It is
kind of weird that this would be shared between these two areas, that
are otherwise both linguistically and geographically quite far
removed, and changing /w/ to /n/ is not so common in the languages of
the world that one would expect it to appear independently (changes
such as the voicing of [k] to [g] and the fusion of [hw] to [f] are
much more common changes, and very likely to occur independently of
each other in different varieties).
But
the really interesting differences between Tabasco Nawat and other
varieties are in the grammar of the language – both in the areas of
morphology and syntax.
One
really interesting aspect, is how plural subjects are marked. In most
Nahuan languages plural subjects are marked on verbs using a suffix
/-h/ or /Ɂ/.
But this is not the case in Tabasco Nawat. Here plural subject is unmarked for the third person, but marked with -lo for the first person, e.g. ti-k-pia-lo "we are guarding it", but ti-k-pia "you are guarding it".
The language also doesnt have a future tense with the suffix -s as in most other varieties, rather future is constructed with the suffix -tiin which in other varieties means "to be going to do X". Negation is expressed with the word até. And the progressive present is expressed periphrastically with the verb nemi which is also used as a general copula.
Below are some examples of phrases in Tabasco Nawat demonstrating most of these interesting features:
chinechtemoli
in nokwach porkeh nimopatatiin
find
me my clothes because I am going to change
niyah
nitamatiin chinechtemoli notegun iwan se morral
I
am going fishing find me my fishing rod and a morral
nehpa
nemi one tagat yun nigittak yalla
there is the man I saw
yesterday
one
tagat yun wallahka yahkiya
the man who came has already left
nigan
nemi takwali yun mokwatiin
here is the food that were going to
eat
iwa:n
one tagat yun yahkiya mokwepatiin
the man who has left will come
back
ka
niga tigochitigiweh
where will we sleep?
Nigan
gan tigochiskiah
this is where we were going to sleep
onehpa
gan mottak one taagat
this is where we saw that man
nigan
gan tigochkeh yallah
this is where we slept yesterday
yallah
tichuugakkeh iwan ami nemilo welia
yesterday we cried, but today we are well
até
tun kichin
he
didnt do anything
tikpialo
we're
taking care of it
iiyomexti
nemi chuuga
the
two of them are crying
geeski
yahwan nemiya?
how
many people were there?
How Cacao is Made
A Cacao pod rotting on the tree: Fermin and many other Cacao producers are plagued by pests, such as disease and squirrels. |
Bueno pues nah nechittago nin noknin
nigan nugal, ge wallah pan dinamarca iiwan negi tahtani tunu tikmati
pan noaltepet pal nologar. Iiwan pos ne ginegi ma nigili lo que gen
motuga gagawat, gen mochowa producir, gen mowaatza, iiwan cuando nemi,
genon mochowa.
Well, I, this friend has come to see me
here in my house, he comes from Denmark and wants to ask what we know
here in my community, in my place. And well he wants me to tell him
how we plant cacao and how it is made to produce, and how it is dried
and when it is there how we do with it.
Bueno pues gagawat cuando motuuga,
primero motuuga kwawit, kwachipili wan tzopankilit iwan ya despues de
ume o eyi xiwit cuando wefeya kwawit, motuuga gagawat, gagawat cuando
peewa taagi de eyi xiwit nawi xiwit peewa xuchowi iwan ya despues
giisa ixuchigagawat op unpewa giisa imasorka iwan opun peewa tagit ya
despues gichowa itaagilo.
Well then, cacao, when it is planted,
first the tree is planted, the kwachipili and tzopankilit, and then
after two or three years when the tree grows, the cacao is planted.
Then when the cacao begins giving fruit at three or four years it
starts flowering and then afterwards the cacao bloom comes out, and
the cob starts coming out and it begins to give fruit, and then it
makes its fruit.
Bueno gagawat despues de seligagawat
wehkaawa eyi meztli cuando wehweiya despues yoksi, despues de yoksi
motegi, motegit gagawat cuando yoksika, despues motapana iiwan luego
mowaatza, mowaatza pan toonatin, iiwan luego ya de wahki pos
monaamaga.
Well, the cacao, then the tender cacao
lasts three months and when it grows then it ripens, after it is
ripe it is cut, the cacao is cut when it has ripened, then it is
cracked open and then it dries, it dries in the sun, and then after
it is dry, well it is sold.
Mowaatza an despues monaamaga,
despues de monaamaga, despues gigoowa, tataxtawilia a veces. A wehka
teemagaya miyak gagawat, ahorita ne ain tiempo ke nemi, nemi
enfermedad pal [onemoliasis]. An ya despues giiski motohtzin
It is dried and then it is sold, after
it is sold, they buy it, sometimes they pay it. Long ago it gave a
lot of cacao, but now in these times that are here, there is disease
[?]. And then afterwards the squirrel came out.
Motohtzin gigwa gagawat, gigwa
seligagawat, despues yoksi entero […] produccion de gagawat porke
tami gigwa, iiwan aparte de aparte de enfermedad tamik migi, iiwan
gigwa motohtzin, yiga yo gagawat até nemi, ate teemaga: Ume plaga nemi
de enfermedad pal gogolisti iiwan aparte pal motohtzin gitamiya.
« despues gigoowa, tataxtawilia a veces », « they buy it, sometimes they pay it » : colonial habits ?…
SvarSletMay I comment a statement in this way ? : « [Tabasco Nawat] also voices the velar stop /k/ to /g/ both between vowels and even frequently at the beginning of words », « following a rule that I have not yet been able to fully work out. »…
SvarSletI dont follow entirely? I think that voicing of k to g is not really rule driven, since there doesnt seem to be an actual phonemic contrast. I think it is just a general tendency. The rule that I haven't been able to figure out is the o/u split since they seem to be in complementary distribution - and perhaps there are even minimal pairs although I havent found any yet.
SletErr. not "complementary distribution", but the same distribution of course.
SletYeah, I think he means that sometimes they pay it *well*, but that is kind of implied. Also there are some things about there that are hard to hear, so maybe I am hearing it wrong. Let me know if you hear something else that I didnt get. I only spent a couple of days with Fermin so I am hardly well accustomed to the variety.
SvarSlet« “my wife” is /no-soa-n/ » : do I understand it well, that it is no-siwa-n (“nocihuāuh”), with « the /w/ having colored the /i/ to [o] » ?
SvarSletYes, exactly.
SletDo you think than Northern Nahuaphones can understand “nosiwa:w” when hearing /nosoan/ ?!…
SletSome Central Nahuan varieties in fact also have the same form. For example Hueyapan Nahuatl which is the variety I know most about. It has both the -w# > -n rule and the /iw/ > /o:/ rule. I've never thought to ask people who have the -siwaw form how hard they find the -soan forms to understand. Presumably they'd only need to hear it once or twice before they'd get used to it.
SletFermín Cruz Álvarez uses « motohtzin » four times, you translate it as a singular (« An ya despues giiski motohtzin. », “And then afterwards the squirrel came out.” ; « Motohtzin gigwa gagawat », “The squirrel eats the cacao”), and as a plural (« iiwan gigwa motohtzin », “and then the squirrels eaR it” ; « iiwan aparte pal motohtzin gitamiya », “and then apart the squirrels finishES it off”). This Nahuatl lacks a plural for « motohtli » – or animals – ? or can we consider that the honorific suffix “-tzin” is here a kind of collective ? In one word, is Fermín’s plantation devasted by one or more squirrels ?…
SvarSletObviously there is more than one squirrel (/motoh/ not /motohtli/) in Fermin's plantation. And obviously the forms he use in each case are grammatically singular. I don't think that is really a contradiction, though arguably I ought to be consistent in translating them as either plural or singular in English.
SvarSletI think it is not uncommon in the worlds languages to use singular forms in a plural sense when describing something that is general. "The dog is man's best friend", for example is a statement about all dogs, not just one. In Nahuatl furthermore plurality is used differently from English or Spanish, in that it is not really obligatory.Inanimate nouns often are not pluralized at all, and even animate nouns that can be pluralized can be used in the singular unless there is a specific contextual reason to specify plurality.
Definitely it is not the diminutive suffix -tzin that carries the plural meaning, it is part of inherent in the pragmatics context the utterance.
« /motoh/ not /motohtli/ » : my first barbarism in Tabasco Nahuat ?!… ;-)
SletIn fact, I understood Fermín’s « motohtzin » – perhaps « Motohtzin » ? – as “Brother Squirrel », as we say in folktales…
In pipil, we have mutu(k)tzin for 'squirrel'. This suffix -tzin usually is used for animals like takwatzin 'oppossum', muluktzin 'tigrillo', shikutzin 'cheje bird, woodpecker', etc. and it seems to nominalize the root to turn it into a "being doing or having X". The plural in pipil is more and more used because of Spanish influence but usually, animals don't pluralize when you talk about them in a collective or general way. So you can say:
Sletnemi mutuktzin tik ne kojtan 'there is squirrel in the woods' 'hay ardillas en el monte'. Nemi masat pal tikpewiat 'hay venados para cazar'.